When In-Memory Computing is Slower than Heavy Disk Usage — mentioned by dalke

Thu, 09 Apr 2015 23:30:59 GMT

This is not interesting. If you read the comments you'll see people complaining that it compared an O(N^2) string append method to an O(N) disk append method. Plus, the link to the research PDF in the Slashdot article is now broken. It should be http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.02678 "When In-Memory Computing is Slower than Heavy Disk Usage". That page comments "This paper has been withdrawn by the authors for personal reasons. No further revisions"

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

When In-Memory Computing is Slower than Heavy Disk Usage · HackerPapers discussions

When In-Memory Computing is Slower than Heavy Disk Usage — mentioned by dalke