<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Test of the universality of free fall with atoms in different spin Orientations · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1503.00433/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1503.00433/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Test of the universality of free fall with atoms in different spin Orientations — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33488376</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1503.00433:33488376</guid><pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2022 02:55:44 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, different quantum spin orientations don&amp;#x27;t appear to evade the weak equivalence principle. Dropping Bose-Einstein condensates in vacuum drop towers is a popular experiment. An example, &amp;quot;Tests of the Universality of Free Fall with Atoms in Different Spin Orientations&amp;quot;, 2016, &amp;lt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.023001&amp;gt; which is the published version of &amp;lt;https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.00433v1&amp;gt;. Likewise, one would not expect a ferromagnet and a ferroic glass to fall differently in a drop tower. Quantum spin is relevant in post-Newtonian (GR-compatible) gravitation, though. Rough…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1503.00433/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.atom-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
