<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1502.01589/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1502.01589/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters — mentioned by namirez</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21449022</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1502.01589:21449022</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2019 02:25:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;You are right but this has already been done using the CMB data and the universe seems flat with a 0.4% uncertainty. I don&amp;#x27;t think there is any need for artificial probes for it. Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.01589&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1502.01589/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.CO</category></item><item><title>Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10972200</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1502.01589:10972200</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2016 06:50:30 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1502.01589/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.CO</category></item></channel></rss>
