<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Introducing an Analysis in Finite Fields · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1501.07502/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1501.07502/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Introducing an Analysis in Finite Fields — mentioned by drdeca</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24608333</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1501.07502:24608333</guid><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2020 17:26:25 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;(I’ve also been wondering for a few years whether it is possible to make a version of quantum mechanics which works with the wavefunctions taking on values from a (very large) finite field instead of the complex numbers. My impression so far is “probably not” because you need exponentials, and the multiplication group of a finite field doesn’t have a nontrivial group homomorphism to/from the additive group. Also, for the simple way of defining differentiation for functions over finite fields, has 0 as the only eigenvalue of differentiation, and I’m thinking that the other definition I made up…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1501.07502/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.NT</category></item></channel></rss>
