<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>It's a Man's Wikipedia? Assessing Gender Inequality in an Online Encyclopedia · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1501.06307/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1501.06307/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>It's a Man's Wikipedia? Assessing Gender Inequality in an Online Encyclopedia — mentioned by IAmEveryone</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23307973</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1501.06307:23307973</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2020 06:15:28 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Inclusivity of editors is a major factor for inclusivity of content. Different demographics have different interests, experiences, and knowledge. It&amp;#x27;s trivially obvious that getting a broader subset of society to contribute will also broaden the content. With less than 10% of editors being women, for example, content is guaranteed to be somewhat skewed, even assuming absolutely no ill will by anybody. Among the famous examples are a scientist&amp;#x27;s entry being deleted as &amp;quot;not notable&amp;quot; just weeks before she won the Nobel Prize. Or, if you prefer quantitative data, that articles about women tend to…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1501.06307/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CY</category></item></channel></rss>
