<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Constraint on the time variation of the fine-structure constant with the SDSS-III/BOSS DR12 quasar sample · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1501.00560/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1501.00560/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Constraint on the time variation of the fine-structure constant with the SDSS-III/BOSS DR12 quasar sample — mentioned by ISL</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15558696</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1501.00560:15558696</guid><pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 13:43:00 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;First, people look really hard to discern whether or not the constants are constant. So far, they are. See [1-3] for quick examples. Second, if the constants were changing, we could simply reference to the value of the constant on a certain date. As the rate of change is now guaranteed by existing experiments to be small, any shift would be very tiny, and easily calculable. The question of the constancy of constants remains a very good one. That question is, by its very nature, its own constant of science. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1501.00560 [2]…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1501.00560/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.CO</category></item></channel></rss>
