<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Bitcoin Meets Strong Consistency · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1412.7935/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1412.7935/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Bitcoin Meets Strong Consistency — mentioned by cnnsucks</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14596485</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1412.7935:14596485</guid><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2017 17:21:22 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Why would there be any need for a contingency plan? That question is probably best put the person that wrote the statement and mentioned that it was under discussion: Christian Decker. He is a published block chain researcher and may have a good answer for you. https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.7935 http://www.tik.ee.ethz.ch/file/49318d3f56c1d525aabf7fda78b23... http://www.tik.ee.ethz.ch/file/7e4a7f3f2991784786037285f4876... http://www.tik.ee.ethz.ch/file/848064fa2e80f88a57aef43d7d595...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1412.7935/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DC</category></item></channel></rss>
