<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Net · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1412.6806/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1412.6806/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Net — mentioned by dontreact</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13274155</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1412.6806:13274155</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2016 22:16:44 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;AllConv networks perform better and are an even simpler modification of the typical CNN architecture: just replace max pool layers with strides convolution. Why did the authors not benchmark against state of the art (also see fractional max pooling) https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6806&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1412.6806/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Net — mentioned by clickok</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11587289</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1412.6806:11587289</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 08:37:37 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The paper itself: http://hi.cs.waseda.ac.jp/~esimo/publications/SimoSerraSIGGR... Part of what makes this neat is that their architecture includes exclusively convolutional layers. Networks that just use such layers have some incredibly useful emergent properties[1] and are about as good as networks with more varied layers[2]. Here they use that to allow for a wide variety of input sizes, because without a fully-connected layer, there&amp;#x27;s no need to resize images as part of the preprocessing, or indeed at any point inside the network. I am a bit skeptical about it being able to handle &amp;quot;any&amp;quot;…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1412.6806/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
