<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Fastest Unbound Stars in the Universe · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1411.5022/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1411.5022/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Fastest Unbound Stars in the Universe — mentioned by mirimir</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9352485</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1411.5022:9352485</guid><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 03:50:43 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The discovery of hypervelocity stars (HVS) leaving our galaxy with speeds of nearly $10^{3}$ km s$^{-1}$ has provided strong evidence towards the existence of a massive compact object at the galaxy&amp;#x27;s center. HVS ejected via the disruption of stellar binaries can occasionally yield a star with $v_{\infty} \lesssim 10^4$ km s$^{-1}$, here we show that this mechanism can be extended to massive black hole (MBH) mergers, where the secondary star is replaced by a MBH with mass $M_2 \gtrsim 10^5 M_{\odot}$. We find that stars that are originally bound to the secondary MBH are frequently ejected with…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1411.5022/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.GA</category></item><item><title>The Fastest Unbound Stars in the Universe — mentioned by throwaway_yy2Di</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8673062</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1411.5022:8673062</guid><pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 04:17:19 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The point isn&amp;#x27;t the absolute amount of mass, but how deep the gravitational wells go -- how rapidly objects can orbit. It&amp;#x27;s not only about massive objects; it&amp;#x27;s about compact ones. If you have only one supermassive black hole, then the 2nd and 3rd objects are a binary star, and the interaction between them is very weak. Stars can&amp;#x27;t orbit each other faster than ~100&amp;#x27;s of km/s (~1,000&amp;#x27;s for white dwarfs): they&amp;#x27;re limited by their low density -- they can&amp;#x27;t get very close or they&amp;#x27;ll collide. If, instead, you have a star orbiting a black hole -- that&amp;#x27;s a very dense object, it allows much closer…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1411.5022/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.GA</category></item><item><title>The Fastest Unbound Stars in the Universe — mentioned by throwaway_yy2Di</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8672986</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1411.5022:8672986</guid><pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 03:27:55 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;For the special case of the ejection of binary stars, described in Section 6, we employ octuple floating-point precision (~64 digits).&amp;quot; http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.5022&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1411.5022/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.GA</category></item></channel></rss>
