HackerPapers

arXiv:1411.4798cs.ET

Memcomputing NP-complete problems in polynomial time using polynomial resources and collective states

Fabio L. Traversa, Chiara Ramella, Fabrizio Bonani, Massimiliano Di Ventra

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Memcomputing is a novel non-Turing paradigm of computation that uses interacting memory cells (memprocessors for short) to store and process information on the same physical platform. It was recently proved mathematically that memcomputing machines have the same computational power of non-deterministic Turing machines. Therefore, they can solve NP-complete problems in polynomial time and, using the appropriate architecture, with resources that only grow polynomially with the input size. The reason for this computational power stems from properties inspired by the brain and shared by any universal memcomputing machine, in particular intrinsic parallelism and information overhead, namely the capability of compressing information in the collective state of the memprocessor network. Here, we show an experimental demonstration of an actual memcomputing architecture that solves the NP-complete version of the subset-sum problem in only one step and is composed of a number of memprocessors that scales linearly with the size of the problem. We have fabricated this architecture using standard microelectronic technology so that it can be easily realized in any laboratory setting. Even though the particular machine presented here is eventually limited by noise--and will thus require error-correcting codes to scale to an arbitrary number of memprocessors--it represents the first proof-of-concept of a machine capable of working with the collective state of interacting memory cells, unlike the present-day single-state machines built using the von Neumann architecture.

arXiv comments
We have corrected minor typos and improved the presentation
Journal reference
Science Advances, Vol. 1, no. 6, pag e1500031, year 2015
DOI
doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500031
Subjects
cs.ETEmerging Technologies cs.NENeural and Evolutionary Computing

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Dec 2017 to Dec 2017. Found in 1 HN submission from Nov 2014 to Nov 2014. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • It's worth noting that Scott Aaronson has commented on previous work by the same authors: https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=2212 . At the time, he was convinced that their approach wouldn't scale. I'm not sure about their current approach, but at a glance it seems similar to…

      whaaswijkView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.