<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Unifying Visual-Semantic Embeddings with Multimodal Neural Language Models · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1411.2539/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1411.2539/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Unifying Visual-Semantic Embeddings with Multimodal Neural Language Models — mentioned by kastnerkyle</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12680301</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1411.2539:12680301</guid><pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2016 22:35:15 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;There are a number of papers tackling a similar task [0][1][2] for anyone who is interested. There isn&amp;#x27;t enough information to tell exactly what is going on with Deepgram, but one way to approach this would be to construct a shared embedding space for words/phrases and speech. These types of embedding spaces are powerful [3][4][5], but not magic. Cool demo, looking forward to seeing more detail about what is going on. However I would quibble with the STT WER quoted above. Maybe in noisy environments with unknown speakers (and no voice normalization) this is accurate, but the kinds of clean…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1411.2539/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Unifying Visual-Semantic Embeddings with Multimodal Neural Language Models — mentioned by tfgg</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8624123</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1411.2539:8624123</guid><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:11:24 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;ArXiv abstract links, which are preferable to direct links to the PDF: http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.2539 http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.1090 http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.4389&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1411.2539/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Unifying Visual-Semantic Embeddings with Multimodal Neural Language Models — mentioned by karpathy</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8621917</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1411.2539:8621917</guid><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 01:24:44 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi all, I&amp;#x27;m the author on the Stanford article, so I can answer any more detailed/technical questions. The article doesn&amp;#x27;t mention this, but closely related work I&amp;#x27;ve only very recently become aware of (if anyone is interested) are additionally: From UofT: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1411.2539v1.pdf From Baidu/UCLA: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1410.1090v1.pdf From Google: http://googleresearch.blogspot.com/2014/11/a-picture-is-wort... From Stanford (our work): http://cs.stanford.edu/people/karpathy/deepimagesent/ Edit: And seemingly also from Berkeley http://arxiv.org/pdf/1411.4389v1.pdf At least from my…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1411.2539/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Unifying Visual-Semantic Embeddings with Multimodal Neural Language Models — mentioned by benanne</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8621903</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1411.2539:8621903</guid><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 01:19:05 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like the Toronto group have been working on something very similar as well: http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/1411.2539 Has anybody been able to find the Google paper? The article says it&amp;#x27;s on arxiv, but I can&amp;#x27;t seem to find it there. All that seems to be published so far is this blog post: http://googleresearch.blogspot.be/2014/11/a-picture-is-worth...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1411.2539/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
