<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>What Maudlin replied to · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1411.2120/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1411.2120/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>What Maudlin replied to — mentioned by phayes</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19316535</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1411.2120:19316535</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 05:11:55 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; If foundations of QM are non-local They&amp;#x27;re not. Non-locality is an artifact of certain interpretations / modifications of QM (where it isn&amp;#x27;t simply a misconception). See e.g. https://sci-hub.tw/10.1088/1751-8113/47/42/424011 and https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.2120 or the QBism intro https://arxiv.org/abs/1311.5253 or Ray Streater&amp;#x27;s old EPR webpage https://web.archive.org/web/20151117174141/http://www.mth.kc... or Gell-Mann&amp;#x27;s video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNAw-xXCcM8 or...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1411.2120/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
