<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Search for Failed Supernovae with The Large Binocular Telescope: First Candidates · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1411.1761/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1411.1761/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Search for Failed Supernovae with The Large Binocular Telescope: First Candidates — mentioned by antognini</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23698420</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1411.1761:23698420</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2020 06:33:16 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;To provide a little bit of context for this work, one of the open questions in astronomy is how core collapse supernovae work. Computational scientists have struggled for a long time to get simulations of core collapse to explode. Typically to get an explosion they have to artificially insert a &amp;quot;piston&amp;quot; somewhere in the system that kicks the system outwards during the collapse and triggers the shock wave. Over maybe the last decade or so there&amp;#x27;s been some thought that if our simulations have trouble getting supernovae to explode, then perhaps nature has trouble getting supernovae to explode…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1411.1761/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.SR</category></item></channel></rss>
