HackerPapers

arXiv:1410.8796physics.soc-ph

Redistricting and the Will of the People

Jonathan C. Mattingly, Christy Vaughn

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We introduce a non-partisan probability distribution on congressional redistricting of North Carolina which emphasizes the equal partition of the population and the compactness of districts. When random districts are drawn and the results of the 2012 election were re-tabulated under the drawn districtings, we find that an average of 7.6 democratic representatives are elected. 95% of the randomly sampled redistrictings produced between 6 and 9 Democrats. Both of these facts are in stark contrast with the 4 Democrats elected in the 2012 elections with the same vote counts. This brings into serious question the idea that such elections represent the "will of the people." It underlines the ability of redistricting to undermine the democratic process, while on the face allowing democracy to proceed.

arXiv comments
10 Figures, Preliminary Version
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
physics.soc-phPhysics and Society math.PRProbability

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Nov 2016 to Nov 2016.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • What if some of the super rich elites leveraged their economic might to counteract the effect of gerrymandering -- perhaps an endowment that explicitly offered a geographically sensitive housing subsidy based on a normalized model for how precincts _should_ be shaped could have…

      breatheoftenView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.