Neuroevolution in Games: State of the Art and Open Challenges · HackerPapers discussions

Neuroevolution in Games: State of the Art and Open Challenges — mentioned by deepnet

Tue, 03 Apr 2018 14:51:40 GMT

Togelius I believe you are in error in Seth Bling's case. The Show More links under his youtube MarI/O video link directly to the Stanley Miikkulainen NEAT paper. and he links the wikipedia page on Neuroevolution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroevolution which cites two [1][2] of your papers among others : yet you say : " it is atrocious because of the complete lack of scholarship. The guy didn't even know he was reinventing the wheel, and didn't care to look it up. " a bit harsh perhaps ? At least mentioning the foundational NEAT paper is not a complete lack of scholarship. I feel you…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Neuroevolution in Games: State of the Art and Open Challenges — mentioned by deepnet

Tue, 03 Apr 2018 12:42:19 GMT

OP, Togelius, is quite wrong in 1 point at least. tl;dr Seth Bling directly references NEAT and his links[Show More [1]] link to 2 Togelius papers[13][14] among many others ! To wit, in OP, Togelius mentions Seth Bling's MarI/O[1] as lacking scholarship because he didn't mention Togelius: " seen as research, it is atrocious because of the complete lack of scholarship. The guy didn't even know he was reinventing the wheel, and didn't care to look it up. " Rather disdaignfully (sadly/ ironically/ poigniantly) Togelius refers to Seth not by name but only as " some guy ". Yet Seth Bling[2] in his…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.