<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Leavitt path algebras: the first decade · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1410.1835/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1410.1835/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Leavitt path algebras: the first decade — mentioned by blurbleblurble</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15949889</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1410.1835:15949889</guid><pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 06:35:53 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Graph theory offers one nice illustration of the transpose (for square matrices). Here&amp;#x27;s a directed graph: ⬐---------¬ n₁ → n₂ → n₃ It can be represented by this adjacency matrix: X = [ 0 1 0 ] [ 0 0 1 ] [ 1 0 0 ] See how there is a 1 for each row i and column j where there is an edge from node i to node j? Okay, now look at the transpose, Xᵀ: Xᵀ = [ 0 0 1 ] [ 1 0 0 ] [ 0 1 0 ] If we interpret this matrix as an adjacency matrix, its graph looks like this: ⬐---------¬ n₃ → n₂ → n₁ Taking the transpose of a directed graph&amp;#x27;s adjacency matrix just reverses the direction of the edges! P.S: some…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1410.1835/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.RA</category></item></channel></rss>
