<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Generalized Low Rank Models · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1410.0342/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1410.0342/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Generalized Low Rank Models — mentioned by LolWolf</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18436995</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1410.0342:18436995</guid><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 23:37:37 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;1. &amp;gt; It&amp;#x27;s theoretically impossible to guarantee a convergence to global optima using gradient descent if the function is non-convex. This is false. See, e.g., [0][1]. 2. I&amp;#x27;m not really sure what the question is here. 3. If your loss is bounded from below (it is a square norm) by 0 and you achieve 0 loss, this means that 0 is a global optimum, since, by definition, no other objective value can be smaller than this number. --- [0] Theorem A.2 in Udell&amp;#x27;s Generalized Low-Rank models paper https://arxiv.org/pdf/1410.0342.pdf [1] B&amp;amp;V Convex Optimization (https://web.stanford.edu/~boyd/cvxbook/)…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1410.0342/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ML</category></item></channel></rss>
