<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Testing the limits of quantum mechanical superpositions · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1410.0270/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1410.0270/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Testing the limits of quantum mechanical superpositions — mentioned by Reelin</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19270099</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1410.0270:19270099</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 09:20:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;You seem to be saying that the uncertainty principle is hiding the underlying reality from us, and that objects are simultaneously wave like and particle like and we just can&amp;#x27;t see it because we&amp;#x27;re &amp;quot;stuck in the system&amp;quot; so to speak. I&amp;#x27;d point out that this line of reasoning is fundamentally untestable - it assumes that things are a certain way, and that because things are that way you can never falsify it. As to life &amp;quot;in the system&amp;quot;, wave functions certainly do appear to collapse in experiments limited to drab reality. Below are links to a couple Nature papers (freely available pdfs) from the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1410.0270/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
