<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Optimal high-level descriptions of dynamical systems · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1409.7403/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1409.7403/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Optimal high-level descriptions of dynamical systems — mentioned by ssivark</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21109154</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1409.7403:21109154</guid><pubDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2019 19:29:35 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately a pointer to the Santa Fe institute is a little too broad to my question (which was specifically about interacting agents, and I was implicitly thinking more about physical embodied beings, somewhat in the spirit of Rodney Brooks&amp;#x27; robots). Also, I&amp;#x27;m keen on concrete analyses rather than vague hand-wavy pontificating. That said, the Santa Fe Institute is a great resource to be reminded of every once in a while. I&amp;#x27;m particularly a fan of a line of research being pursued by Simon Dedeo (and others). eg: Optimal high-level descriptions of dynamical systems…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1409.7403/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.IT</category></item></channel></rss>
