<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>PCC: Re-architecting Congestion Control for Consistent High Performance · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1409.7092/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1409.7092/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>PCC: Re-architecting Congestion Control for Consistent High Performance — mentioned by brighten</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8864422</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1409.7092:8864422</guid><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 20:50:01 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Check the paper for all the magic: http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.7092 Sec 2.1 describes the key ideas, with longer description after. PCC gets consistent high performance because it observes what performance outcome actually results from a particular sending rate -- rather than assuming that certain events like a packet loss should be hardwired to certain actions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1409.7092/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.NI</category></item><item><title>PCC: Re-architecting Congestion Control for Consistent High Performance — mentioned by jcr</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8862866</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1409.7092:8862866</guid><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 16:26:00 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;With a quick search, ICTCP and DCTCP are mentioned in the paper [1], but I haven&amp;#x27;t finished actually reading it yet. [1] http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.7092&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1409.7092/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.NI</category></item><item><title>PCC: Re-architecting Congestion Control for Consistent High Performance — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8381480</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1409.7092:8381480</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 02:34:20 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;PCC: Re-architecting Congestion Control for Consistent High Performance [pdf]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;32 points; 13 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1409.7092/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.NI</category></item></channel></rss>
