<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Gender-based Systematics in HST Proposal Selection · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1409.3528/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1409.3528/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Gender-based Systematics in HST Proposal Selection — mentioned by greeneggs</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13011271</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1409.3528:13011271</guid><pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 03:00:48 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This paper, from 2014, says that the Hubble space telescope is oversubscribed by 4:1 to 5:1. [1] That&amp;#x27;s a higher acceptance rate than most government funding grants these days (unfortunately). Perhaps it suggests that there is still a lot of unmet demand for good science to be done with it. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.3528&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1409.3528/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.IM</category></item></channel></rss>
