<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>abc triples · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1409.2974/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1409.2974/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>abc triples — mentioned by lvh</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15212363</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1409.2974:15212363</guid><pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2017 14:35:32 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The article didn&amp;#x27;t explain the abc conjecture in much detail (&amp;quot;The original proof is of the long-standing ABC conjecture that explores the deep nature of numbers, centred on the simple equation a + b = c.&amp;quot;). That&amp;#x27;s unfortunate, because even though the proof is inscrutable, the conjecture itself isn&amp;#x27;t very complicated: If three numbers a, b, and c are coprime and two numbers a and b have large prime factors, then their sum c generally does not. To make that a little more formal, it means that the radical (product of distinct prime factors) of their product abc is usually less than the sum c…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1409.2974/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.NT</category></item></channel></rss>
