HackerPapers

arXiv:1409.2794physics.data-an

Dimensionless Units in the SI

Peter J. Mohr, William D. Phillips

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

The International System of Units (SI) is supposed to be coherent. That is, when a combination of units is replaced by an equivalent unit, there is no additional numerical factor. Here we consider dimensionless units as defined in the SI, {\it e.g.} angular units like radians or steradians and counting units like radioactive decays or molecules. We show that an incoherence may arise when different units of this type are replaced by a single dimensionless unit, the unit "one", and suggest how to properly include such units into the SI in order to remove the incoherence. In particular, we argue that the radian is the appropriate coherent unit for angles and that hertz is not a coherent unit in the SI. We also discuss how including angular and counting units affects the fundamental constants.

arXiv comments
19 pages
Journal reference
Metrologia 52 40-47 (2015)
DOI
doi:10.1088/0026-1394/52/1/40
Subjects
physics.data-anData Analysis, Statistics and Probability physics.class-phClassical Physics physics.hist-phHistory and Philosophy of Physics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Sep 2014 to Sep 2014.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • I mean, sure, it's going to be turtles the whole way down if you're looking to define the universe without resorting to physical quantities (that is, dimensioned units). We don't have anything like a Grand Unified Theory yet, wherein we define Physics by means of some elemental…

      HCIdivision17View on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.