HackerPapers

arXiv:1409.1837hep-th

Back-reaction of the Hawking radiation flux on a gravitationally collapsing star II

Laura Mersini-Houghton

Abstract

A star collapsing gravitationally into a black hole emits a flux of radiation, known as Hawking radiation. When the initial state of a quantum field on the background of the star, is placed in the Unruh vacuum in the far past, then in the exterior Hawking radiation corresponds to a flux of positive energy radiation travelling outwards from near the surface to future infinity. Based on pair creation, the evaporation of the collapsing star can be equivalently described by the absorption of an ingoing negative energy flux of radiation travelling towards the center of the star. Here, we are interested in the evolution of the star during its collapse. Thus we include the backreaction of the negative energy Hawking flux in the interior geometry of the collapsing star when writing the full 4-dimensional Einstein and hydrodynamic equations. Hawking radiation emitted before the star passes through its Schwarzschild radius slows down and reverses the collapse of the star. The star evaporates without forming an horizon or a singularity. This study provides a more realistic investigation than the one first presented in [1], since the backreaction of Hawking radiation flux on the collapsing star is studied in the case when the initial state of the field is in Unruh's vacuum.

arXiv comments
9 pages, 4 figures, a typo corrected, more detailed explanations added for clarity
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
hep-thHigh Energy Physics, Theory gr-qcGeneral Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 3 comments across 2 threads, from Sep 2014 to Jun 2023.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • This is a copy of https://uncnewsarchive.unc.edu/2014/09/23/carolinas-laura-me... , which it gives as a source. That is titled "Carolina’s Laura Mersini-Houghton shows that black holes do not exist". That source (unlike this one) gives a date - from 2014. So, not a new study.…

      eesmithView on HNParent context

    • I don't think that is a response to this work. That is dated February 1. He links to this paper's author, Laura Mersini-Houghton, but he links to a paper and blog post of hers from January. Reading that blog post (http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2014/01/if-it-quacks-like-b...)…

      scott_sView on HNParent context

    • I think that interested people should just read the abstract, introduction and conclusions of the actual paper: http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1409.1837 You will not understand the full implications of it (well, unless you are an astrophysicist), and I didn't bother with the meat of…

      scott_sView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.