<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Tackling the Minimal Superpermutation Problem · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1408.5108/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1408.5108/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Tackling the Minimal Superpermutation Problem — mentioned by robinhouston</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18286888</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1408.5108:18286888</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 19:59:53 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The technique may be different, but the results seem to be identical to what you get from the standard method e.g. described in Section 2 of http://www.njohnston.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/minimal_s...; or section 1 of https://arxiv.org/pdf/1408.5108.pdf; or as implemented by https://github.com/superpermutators/superperm/blob/master/bi... This method produces superpermutations of length 1! + 2! + ... + n!, which was believed for a long time to be the best possible. But Greg Egan’s new result shows it’s possible to do a lot better than that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1408.5108/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.CO</category></item><item><title>Tackling the Minimal Superpermutation Problem — mentioned by robinhouston</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12673920</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1408.5108:12673920</guid><pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2016 22:31:20 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Not so long ago, we’d say “That’s an NP-complete problem” with the implication that it was hopeless to expect an efficient solution. Now (to exaggerate a little) it’s more like a sign that there probably is an efficient solution using some powerful solver. LKH is a lovely piece of work. I used it a couple of years ago to find a counterexample to an unimportant but fairly long-standing conjecture in combinatorics[0], and the list of scientific applications[1] is impressively diverse. The best SMT solvers are also hugely impressive. Z3 has an excellent interactive tutorial and online solver.[2]…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1408.5108/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.CO</category></item></channel></rss>
