<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Online networks and subjective well-being · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1408.3550/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1408.3550/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Online networks and subjective well-being — mentioned by tim333</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8246593</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1408.3550:8246593</guid><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2014 14:57:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Reading the paper the article is based on (http://arxiv.org/pdf/1408.3550v1.pdf)- the evidence seems pretty weak: &amp;quot;Subjective well-being is observed through the answers to the question “How satisfied are you with your life as a whole nowadays?”. Answers range on a scale from 0 (extremely dissatisfied) to 10 (extremely satisfied)&amp;quot; The average results are about 7 ( between 7.25 and 7.76 in the North, 7.02 and 7.21 in the Center and 6.85 and 7.26 in the South) And for social networking sites &amp;quot;the total net effect is negative and amounts to about -0.15%.&amp;quot; So that&amp;#x27;s a change of like 7.25 down to…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1408.3550/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CY</category></item></channel></rss>
