RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Response · HackerPapers discussions

RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Response — mentioned by tempay

Tue, 12 Sep 2017 11:02:24 GMT

This would be a flawed implementation. The method still works, you just have to be extremely careful to avoid exposing users through correlations when collecting anything more than a single value just once. The aforementioned RAPPOR paper[1] covers this in Section 6. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.6981

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Response — mentioned by sp332

Tue, 22 Aug 2017 14:46:03 GMT

1. Any data collection at all deanonymizes the user, cf panopticlick. This isn't true. Panopticlick collects a ton of data about your browser that this proposal will not. There has been a lot of research done in this area and we know how to collect anonymous datasets. https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.6981

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Response — mentioned by veeti

Tue, 22 Aug 2017 12:42:49 GMT

RTFA: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1407.6981.pdf

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Response — mentioned by chubot

Tue, 14 Jun 2016 18:41:19 GMT

Google differential privacy technology, used in Chrome, starting in 2014: http://www.computerworld.com/article/2841954/googles-rappor-... https://github.com/google/rappor https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.6981 (I worked on this) I don't see any mention in the article of what algorithms Apple is using, or a link to the code. In the area of privacy, the code should really be open source, for obvious reasons.

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Response — HN submission

Thu, 31 Jul 2014 11:06:19 GMT

RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Response (ACM 2014)

2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.