<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Why do we remember the past and not the future? The 'time oriented coarse graining' hypothesis · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1407.3384/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1407.3384/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Why do we remember the past and not the future? The 'time oriented coarse graining' hypothesis — mentioned by goldenkey</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32211840</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1407.3384:32211840</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2022 09:52:52 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Particularly his work on relational quantum mechanics and course-graining model of entropy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relational_quantum_mechanics https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.3384&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1407.3384/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item><item><title>Why do we remember the past and not the future? The 'time oriented coarse graining' hypothesis — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18507746</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1407.3384:18507746</guid><pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2018 03:50:57 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I haven&amp;#x27;t read Rovelli&amp;#x27;s pop-sci book. Could you glance through the table of contents and/or the index and look for, among other things, &amp;quot;thermal time&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;time emerges in a world without time&amp;quot;? I would be astonished if he did not discuss these ideas at length in his book. &amp;gt; Rovelli&amp;#x27;s words from a book 23 years newer than your referenced article, seem to directly contradict what you&amp;#x27;re arguing Ok, let&amp;#x27;s deal with that. It&amp;#x27;s not like he stopped writing on the topic or substantially changed his position (rather than elucidating it). You can click on arXiv:1505.01125, arXiv:1407.3384, and…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1407.3384/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item><item><title>Why do we remember the past and not the future? The 'time oriented coarse graining' hypothesis — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8042031</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1407.3384:8042031</guid><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 14:04:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Why do we remember the past and not the future?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1407.3384/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item></channel></rss>
