<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The quantum pigeonhole principle and the nature of quantum correlations · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1407.3194/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1407.3194/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The quantum pigeonhole principle and the nature of quantum correlations — mentioned by acqq</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10945340</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1407.3194:10945340</guid><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 14:26:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The text by the New Scientist, now retold by the Daily Mail (why now? just the &amp;quot;content spam&amp;quot; I guess), is from July 2014 (!): https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22329802-300-pigeon-p... It would be surprising that DM covers such a subject first? The PDF of the work: http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.3194 The first and the third listed authors: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yakir_Aharonov http://www.bristol.ac.uk/physics/people/sandu-popescu/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1407.3194/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
