HackerPapers

arXiv:1407.2893cs.SI

Understanding the group dynamics and success of teams

Michael Klug, James P. Bagrow

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Complex problems often require coordinated group effort and can consume significant resources, yet our understanding of how teams form and succeed has been limited by a lack of large-scale, quantitative data. We analyze activity traces and success levels for ~150,000 self-organized, online team projects. While larger teams tend to be more successful, workload is highly focused across the team, with only a few members performing most work. We find that highly successful teams are significantly more focused than average teams of the same size, that their members have worked on more diverse sets of projects, and the members of highly successful teams are more likely to be core members or 'leads' of other teams. The relations between team success and size, focus and especially team experience cannot be explained by confounding factors such as team age, external contributions from non-team members, nor by group mechanisms such as social loafing. Taken together, these features point to organizational principles that may maximize the success of collaborative endeavors.

arXiv comments
20 pages, 4 figures, supporting information included
Journal reference
R. Soc. open sci. 2016 3 160007
DOI
doi:10.1098/rsos.160007
Subjects
cs.SISocial and Information Networks cs.CYComputers and Society physics.data-anData Analysis, Statistics and Probability physics.soc-phPhysics and Society

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from Jan 2015 to Jan 2015. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.