<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Deep Neural Networks Rival the Representation of Primate IT Cortex for Core Visual Object Recognition · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1406.3284/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1406.3284/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Deep Neural Networks Rival the Representation of Primate IT Cortex for Core Visual Object Recognition — mentioned by fchollet</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9102805</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1406.3284:9102805</guid><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 19:14:33 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;There seems to be some confusion between complexity, quantity of DNA, and intelligence as a measure of organism complexity. A larger quantity of DNA does not translate into a more &amp;quot;complex&amp;quot; organism, as amoebas prove. In fact, I would think it likely that organisms with a very large codebase have to be very simple ones, since the simpler an organism is the &amp;quot;safer&amp;quot; it is to add useless DNA code to it without breaking anything essential. And consider intelligence: it is generally thought that the human brain is largely self-similar (the same structures can be observed throughout the cortex…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1406.3284/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>q-bio.NC</category></item></channel></rss>
