<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1406.1078/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1406.1078/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation — mentioned by ndh2</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14794651</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1406.1078:14794651</guid><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 06:36:52 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting, thanks! On https://www.tensorflow.org/tutorials/seq2seq I found a link to https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.1078, which says &amp;gt; $One RNN encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols.$ To me it sounds like they use an RNN to learn a hash function. Thanks for the NTM link, I&amp;#x27;ll check it out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1406.1078/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation — mentioned by ogrisel</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8891547</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1406.1078:8891547</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:01:51 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;New neural machine translation architectures are experimenting with pairs of neural encoders / decoders, one pair for each language and a shared language independent vector space for the meaning of all words: http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.1078 http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.3215 http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.8206 So the total number of models is still linear with the number of languages. I do not know whether this new generation of translation models is leveraged by the google translation app though. Also pairs of languages for which their are big amount of parallel training data will still be favored.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1406.1078/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
