HackerPapers

arXiv:1405.7351astro-ph.CO

Toward an Understanding of Foreground Emission in the BICEP2 Region

Raphael Flauger, J. Colin Hill, David N. Spergel

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

BICEP2 has reported the detection of a degree-scale B-mode polarization pattern in the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) and has interpreted the measurement as evidence for primordial gravitational waves. Motivated by the profound importance of the discovery of gravitational waves from the early Universe, we examine to what extent a combination of Galactic foregrounds and lensed E-modes could be responsible for the signal. We reanalyze the BICEP2 results and show that the 100x150 GHz and 150x150 GHz data are consistent with a cosmology with r=0.2 and negligible foregrounds, but also with a cosmology with r=0 and a significant dust polarization signal. We give independent estimates of the dust polarization signal in the BICEP2 region using four different approaches. While these approaches are consistent with each other, the expected amplitude of the dust polarization power spectrum remains uncertain by about a factor of three. The lower end of the prediction leaves room for a primordial contribution, but at the higher end the dust in combination with the standard CMB lensing signal could account for the BICEP2 observations, without requiring the existence of primordial gravitational waves. By measuring the cross-correlations between the pre-Planck templates used in the BICEP2 analysis and between different versions of a data-based template, we emphasize that cross-correlations between models are very sensitive to noise in the polarization angles and that measured cross-correlations are likely underestimates of the contribution of foregrounds to the map. These results suggest that BICEP1 and BICEP2 data alone cannot distinguish between foregrounds and a primordial gravitational wave signal, and that future Keck Array observations at 100 GHz and Planck observations at higher frequencies will be crucial to determine whether the signal is of primordial origin. (abridged)

arXiv comments
11 pages, 5 figures, v2: typographical errors corrected, references added, comments added, submitted for publication in JCAP
Journal reference
DOI
doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/08/039
Subjects
astro-ph.COCosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics gr-qcGeneral Relativity and Quantum Cosmology hep-phHigh Energy Physics, Phenomenology hep-thHigh Energy Physics, Theory

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Jun 2014 to Jun 2014.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

  1. Big Bang finding challenged 1 comment
    • The "random blog posts" are by Adam Falkowski, a particle physicist who has been following the controversy over BICEP2 from the start. They document how opinion has been swinging over time. Steinhardt is not "the guy who the first source is referencing". The two references in…

      T-AView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.