<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Comments On: A Universe From Nothing · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1405.6091/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1405.6091/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Comments On: A Universe From Nothing — mentioned by crdrost</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23543665</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1405.6091:23543665</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 20:29:02 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;So, uh, general relativity makes all of this stuff really complicated. First off, the gravitational energy is not a direct component in the stress-energy tensor that serves as a &amp;quot;source&amp;quot; for gravitational curvature. So it is formally incorrect to say that the gravitational potential energy is a source for gravity. However, the Einstein equations are not linear the way the Maxwell equations are, and you can maybe interpret these nonlinearities as a self-interaction of the gravitational field, causing gravity to be a source of gravity. But the analogy does not seem to be as easy as just saying…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1405.6091/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.gen-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
