https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1405.3483/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7967593urn:hackerpapers:mention:1405.3483:7967593Mon, 30 Jun 2014 20:45:54 GMT<p>I agree that progress in experimental abilities and QC is really forcing physicists to think carefully about what QM means. In fact the month of May saw three papers by major physicists about these deeper issues in QM [1,2,3] In my own humble capacity as a graduate student in physics, my research is about clearly understanding the divide between classical and quantum physics. On the rewriting of theory, I should have been clearer. I meant that when you rewrite the theory you should think about ontology. Differences in ontology between different rewrites, as well as interpretations of those…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1405.3483/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>quant-ph