<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Design and analysis of experiments in networks: Reducing bias from interference · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1404.7530/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1404.7530/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Design and analysis of experiments in networks: Reducing bias from interference — mentioned by pougetj</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15484861</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1404.7530:15484861</guid><pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2017 17:12:25 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m currently in the process of getting my phd on this exact topic and I&amp;#x27;m always happy to hear the problem of network interference in A/B tests being tackled at more and more tech companies. Here&amp;#x27;s a small (incomplete) list of (mainly industrial) references to solutions to this problem. - Facebook data scientists have an extensive list of publications on the topic: [1][2]. (Dean Eckles is now at MIT). - LinkedIn&amp;#x27;s experimentation team has also published papers on the topic: [3][4] - Data scientists at Google have also worked on this topic. One external publication/collaboration I&amp;#x27;m aware of…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1404.7530/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ME</category></item></channel></rss>
