<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Unconditional quantum teleportation between distant solid-state qubits · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1404.4369/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1404.4369/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Unconditional quantum teleportation between distant solid-state qubits — mentioned by X4</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7967979</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1404.4369:7967979</guid><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 21:55:23 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Paper in short: http://download.repubblica.it/pdf/2014/scienze/science-xpres... Paper in full: http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.4369 To the physicists among the us, please share your opinion on the paper with the rest of us. It&amp;#x27;s not easy to digest the paper. The finding is not only going to change finance, but also the whole data economy will speed up. Now &amp;#x27;Quants&amp;#x27; can be located anywhere and everyone has can enjoy same advantage of datacenter-closeness, evening out the prestigious role of the select few. Well, not really. It&amp;#x27;s going to take quite some time until the mid-class can access this…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1404.4369/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Unconditional quantum teleportation between distant solid-state qubits — mentioned by Spittie</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7818845</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1404.4369:7818845</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 21:56:02 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This seems to be the full paper, if anyone can understand it: http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.4369 (If there is a way to make me feel stupid fast is to read those papers).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1404.4369/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Unconditional quantum teleportation between distant solid-state qubits — mentioned by jpmattia</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7818811</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1404.4369:7818811</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 21:50:25 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Mods should switch to the NYT headline (&amp;quot;Scientists Report Finding Reliable Way to Teleport Data&amp;quot;), which is appropriate. The current HN headline (&amp;quot;New Research in Faster-than-light Communication&amp;quot;) is out to lunch. Entanglement is not FTL communication. Edit (having now skimmed the paper from Spittie http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.4369): Quantum teleportation isn&amp;#x27;t FTL communication either.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1404.4369/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
