<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Open Question Answering with Weakly Supervised Embedding Models · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1404.4326/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1404.4326/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Open Question Answering with Weakly Supervised Embedding Models — mentioned by nl</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9351644</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1404.4326:9351644</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 23:14:45 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This is pretty impressive. It beats average human performance in the history category, but is outperformed by humans in literature. Note that part of the data preparation process includes building a dependency-parse tree. From the abstract I&amp;#x27;d thought the model was learning to do that too, which would have been very impressive. In general this approach is somewhat related to [1] in that both rely on knowledge representation similarities. I&amp;#x27;m not entirely clear about how this groups approach interfaces the learned model and the IR querying. [1] Open Question Answering with Weakly Supervised…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1404.4326/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
