HackerPapers

arXiv:1403.7686quant-ph

Computational solution to quantum foundational problems

Arkady Bolotin

Abstract

This paper argues that the requirement of applicableness of quantum linearity to any physical level from molecules and atoms to the level of macroscopic extensional world, which leads to a main foundational problem in quantum theory referred to as the "measurement problem", actually has a computational character: It implies that there is a generic algorithm, which guarantees exact solutions to the Schrodinger equation for every physical system in a reasonable amount of time regardless of how many constituent microscopic particles it comprises. From the point of view of computational complexity theory, this requirement is equivalent to the assumption that the computational complexity classes P and NP are equal, which is widely believed to be very unlikely. As demonstrated in the paper, accepting the different computational assumption called the Exponential Time Hypothesis (that involves P!=NP) would justify the separation between a microscopic quantum system and a macroscopic apparatus (usually called the Heisenberg cut) since this hypothesis, if true, would imply that deterministic quantum and classical descriptions are impossible to overlap in order to obtain a rigorous derivation of complete properties of macroscopic objects from their microstates.

arXiv comments
Paper accepted for publication in Physical Science International Journal. Please refer to this (final) version as a reference
Journal reference
Phys. Sci. Int. J. 2014; 4(8): 1145-1157
DOI
Subjects
quant-phQuantum Physics

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 2 comments across 2 threads, from Jan 2015 to Jul 2016. Found in 1 HN submission from Apr 2014 to Apr 2014. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • I feel that this is so important that I'll just quote the central part of Aaronson's response: OK everyone: At several people’s request, I’ve now taken a look at arXiv:1403.7686, and I can confirm that it’s complete garbage. Aaronson explains why, too.

      cslView on HNParent context

  1. [dead] 1 comment
    • For anyone interested, here's Scott Aaronson's response to the paper: http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=1767#comment-103591 OK everyone: At several people’s request, I’ve now taken a look at arXiv:1403.7686, and I can confirm that it’s complete garbage. The author is simply…

      JamesArgoView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.