<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Equivalence of wave-particle duality to entropic uncertainty · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1403.4687/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1403.4687/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Equivalence of wave-particle duality to entropic uncertainty — mentioned by ChuckMcM</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8774724</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1403.4687:8774724</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 21:47:31 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Here is the paper: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1403.4687v2.pdf My quick read suggests that the authors are restating the relationship using their &amp;quot;Entropic View&amp;quot; notation which, as it turns out, has the same expression if you come at it from the uncertainty principle side or the wave equation side. That is nice from the point of view of validating their notation but it doesn&amp;#x27;t give us anything we didn&amp;#x27;t already know.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1403.4687/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Equivalence of wave-particle duality to entropic uncertainty — mentioned by ajkjk</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8774475</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1403.4687:8774475</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 20:59:10 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;http://arxiv.org/pdf/1403.4687v2.pdf is the actual preprint. I&amp;#x27;m finding it pretty hard to parse. It seems to be a reformulation of what we already know about non-commuting observables in terms of entropy/ignorance. I might need to read some of the cited papers to understand exactly if that&amp;#x27;s significant and why.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1403.4687/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Equivalence of wave-particle duality to entropic uncertainty — mentioned by noobermin</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8774447</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1403.4687:8774447</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 20:54:06 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;http://arxiv.org/pdf/1403.4687v2.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1403.4687/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
