HackerPapers

arXiv:1402.4848quant-ph

Logic gates at the surface code threshold: Superconducting qubits poised for fault-tolerant quantum computing

R. Barends, J. Kelly, A. Megrant, A. Veitia, D. Sank, E. Jeffrey, T. C. White, J. Mutus, A. G. Fowler, B. Campbell, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, C. Neill, P. O`Malley, P. Roushan, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, A. N. Korotkov, A. N. Cleland, John M. Martinis

Abstract

A quantum computer can solve hard problems - such as prime factoring, database searching, and quantum simulation - at the cost of needing to protect fragile quantum states from error. Quantum error correction provides this protection, by distributing a logical state among many physical qubits via quantum entanglement. Superconductivity is an appealing platform, as it allows for constructing large quantum circuits, and is compatible with microfabrication. For superconducting qubits the surface code is a natural choice for error correction, as it uses only nearest-neighbour coupling and rapidly-cycled entangling gates. The gate fidelity requirements are modest: The per-step fidelity threshold is only about 99%. Here, we demonstrate a universal set of logic gates in a superconducting multi-qubit processor, achieving an average single-qubit gate fidelity of 99.92% and a two-qubit gate fidelity up to 99.4%. This places Josephson quantum computing at the fault-tolerant threshold for surface code error correction. Our quantum processor is a first step towards the surface code, using five qubits arranged in a linear array with nearest-neighbour coupling. As a further demonstration, we construct a five-qubit Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) state using the complete circuit and full set of gates. The results demonstrate that Josephson quantum computing is a high-fidelity technology, with a clear path to scaling up to large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum circuits.

arXiv comments
15 pages, 13 figures, including supplementary material
Journal reference
Nature 508, 500-503 (2014)
DOI
doi:10.1038/nature13171
Subjects
quant-phQuantum Physics cond-mat.mes-hallMesoscale and Nanoscale Physics cond-mat.supr-conSuperconductivity

On Hacker News

Linked by 3 identifiable commenters in 3 comments across 3 threads, from Apr 2014 to Sep 2018. Found in 1 HN submission from Feb 2014 to Feb 2014. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments3 threads

    • > The [two qubit] gates are about as reliable as any others you will find in the quantum computing world, which is to say that operations complete successfully around 93 percent of the time. For comparison, ion-based quantum computers are at 95 to 99 percent and superconducting…

      StrilancView on HNParent context

    • It depends on the implementation. Ion traps are slower than superconducting qubits, for example, although they are speeding up. This paper, from 2014, gives some parameters: "Logic gates at the surface code threshold: Superconducting qubits poised for fault-tolerant quantum…

      greeneggsView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.