<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Note on fair coin toss via Bitcoin · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1402.3698/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1402.3698/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Note on fair coin toss via Bitcoin — mentioned by EthanHeilman</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17286803</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1402.3698:17286803</guid><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2018 18:11:07 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;It&amp;#x27;s more like a two-party roll of a die with a practically infinite number of faces. If both rolls sum even, Alice wins. Otherwise, Bob wins. What you are describing is a coin flipping protocol [0]. From the article: &amp;gt;To my knowledge this is the first time someone has proposed such a scheme on Bitcoin though I suppose it&amp;#x27;s possible it has come up before and I just missed it. There have been coin flipping protocols for Bitcoin since at least 2013-2014 [1]. The main contribution of the above post appears to be that they actually performed the protocol which is neat and quite a bit of work.…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1402.3698/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>Note on fair coin toss via Bitcoin — mentioned by lappa</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10012939</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1402.3698:10012939</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 21:20:47 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A smart contract is a contract that can be executed with the trust parameters you set, these parameters are less limited than typical contracts have since they don&amp;#x27;t have an inherent necessity to trust a government or even a counterparty. Some contracts don&amp;#x27;t require anyone&amp;#x27;s trust. The most basic &amp;quot;smart contract&amp;quot; is a Bitcoin payment, the contract says &amp;quot;pay this to anyone who can produce a signature corresponding to the public key I have hashed in this contract&amp;quot;[1]. The less used smart contract involving cryptography can be &amp;quot;pay this amount to anyone who can find any sha256 collision&amp;quot;[2], or…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1402.3698/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
