<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Globally Causal Solutions for Gravitational Collapse · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1402.1524/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1402.1524/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Globally Causal Solutions for Gravitational Collapse — mentioned by JadeNB</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17101102</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1402.1524:17101102</guid><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 13:06:14 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; https://arxiv.org/abs/1402.1524 (Which was published about half a year after I initially and timestamped communicated the idea to a physics teacher who was willing to explain me the differential maths used in Einstein&amp;#x27;s field equations.) Maybe I&amp;#x27;m misunderstanding your point, but your parenthesis seems to suggest that you would like to claim some credit for the idea. If not, then you can just ignore what I&amp;#x27;m about to say. If so, then your comment seems to suggest that you came up with the idea, but weren&amp;#x27;t sure about the mathematics of it. In modern physics of this type, where…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1402.1524/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item><item><title>Globally Causal Solutions for Gravitational Collapse — mentioned by namibj</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17101026</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1402.1524:17101026</guid><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 12:53:49 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Uh, this is why I tried to study pure maths (it&amp;#x27;s less physics and more weird differential geometry) I can recommend this paper [0] that talks about simulations that show a black hole just implodes in a weird way and kind of does not stop imploding, due to space-time getting stretched with a speed above that of light, as measured within a frozen moment in time, and summed over some line from inside to outside. A working analogy could be a 2d-spacetime, represented in 3d-space as a soap bubble film. Imagine the traditional visual funnel shape the space time around a black hole is often…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1402.1524/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
