<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>How "Quantum" is the D-Wave Machine? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1401.7087/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1401.7087/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>How "Quantum" is the D-Wave Machine? — mentioned by acqq</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7771684</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1401.7087:7771684</guid><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 08:39:05 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=1679 &amp;quot;MAGIC 8-BALL: THE RENEGADE MATH WHIZ WHO COULD CHANGE NUMBERS FOREVER An eccentric billionaire, whose fascinating hobbies include nude skydiving and shark-taming, has been shaking up the scientific world lately with his controversial claim that 8+0 equals 17 [... six more pages about the billionaire redacted ...] It must be said that mathematicians, who we reached for comment because we&amp;#x27;re diligent reporters, have tended to be miffed, skeptical, and sometimes even sarcastic about the billionaire&amp;#x27;s claims. Not surprisingly, though, the billionaire and…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1401.7087/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>How "Quantum" is the D-Wave Machine? — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7279344</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1401.7087:7279344</guid><pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 20:51:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;How &amp;quot;Quantum&amp;quot; is the D-Wave Machine?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1401.7087/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>How "Quantum" is the D-Wave Machine? — mentioned by nmc</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7178098</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1401.7087:7178098</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 15:44:02 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Impressive. This guy goes to the extent of linking to the transcript of a talk perfectly irrelevant to the point. But he cannot link to the paper he is criticizing. So here it is: Shin et al. How &amp;quot;Quantum&amp;quot; is the D-Wave Machine? http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.7087&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1401.7087/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
