https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1401.6958/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8645788urn:hackerpapers:mention:1401.6958:8645788Sat, 22 Nov 2014 15:56:07 GMT<p>I think this is the paper: http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.6958 .</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1401.6958/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>quant-phhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8611490urn:hackerpapers:mention:1401.6958:8611490Sat, 15 Nov 2014 11:48:15 GMT<p>Absolutely nothing in either the article you linked or the actual published paper the article links to [0] indicates that the experts think this points the way to FTL signalling of any type. The article might have glossed over that, but the researchers wouldn&#x27;t have. Anyone who thought they had a way to send information FTL would be heralding it from the rooftops, because that, and not quantum teleportation or quantum solid-state whatever, would be the main story. Why? Because FTL signalling inherently means causality is broken. Effects can precede causes. You can send information back in…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1401.6958/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>quant-ph