<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Has Hawking radiation been measured? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1401.6612/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1401.6612/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Has Hawking radiation been measured? — mentioned by cthalupa</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21007734</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1401.6612:21007734</guid><pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 17:30:02 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I specifically stated we have not seen it coming off of a black hole, but dismissing this as just a simulation is silly and reductionist. To do the same in a counter-argument, if I can accurately model fluid dynamics, I don&amp;#x27;t have to go drop a log in my bathtub to observe the effects. But sure, if you want, we can discount that specific study and focus on others that use different methods to detect it that aren&amp;#x27;t &amp;quot;just simulations&amp;quot; https://arxiv.org/abs/1009.4634 https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.6612&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1401.6612/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
