<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Introduction to Regularity Structures · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1401.3014/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1401.3014/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Introduction to Regularity Structures — mentioned by naishoya</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49560770</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1401.3014:49560770</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 05:16:11 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Plagiarizing on a massive scale to generate works which appear to be Fields-medal-level results is not the same thing as inventing new conceptualizations in mathematics. No matter how bodly they write the headlines, what has happened in mathematics using Large Language Models is very much &amp;quot;inference over a bounded search space&amp;quot; even if those bounds are immense. For a comparison of true creation of novel conceptualization in mathematics is submit the works of Martin Hairer, one of which is Introduction to Regularity Structures, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1401.3014] None of the so called, &amp;quot;novel…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1401.3014/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.AP</category></item><item><title>Introduction to Regularity Structures — mentioned by kkylin</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24444695</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1401.3014:24444695</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2020 16:54:18 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A quick search shows this: https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.3014 which still requires a substantial mathematical background, but seems rather less technical (I&amp;#x27;ve not read it). There&amp;#x27;s also a textbook on rough paths by Friz and Hairer with an introduction to regularity structures; if you&amp;#x27;re at an academic institution with access to SpringerLink, you may be able to get it easily. Finally, Martin gives lots of talks, and he&amp;#x27;s an exceptionally clear speaker. I wouldn&amp;#x27;t be surprised if there&amp;#x27;s something on YouTube that&amp;#x27;s reasonably accessible to someone with a solid math / physics background.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1401.3014/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.AP</category></item></channel></rss>
