HackerPapers

arXiv:1401.1219quant-ph

Consciousness as a State of Matter

Max Tegmark

Abstract

We examine the hypothesis that consciousness can be understood as a state of matter, "perceptronium", with distinctive information processing abilities. We explore five basic principles that may distinguish conscious matter from other physical systems such as solids, liquids and gases: the information, integration, independence, dynamics and utility principles. If such principles can identify conscious entities, then they can help solve the quantum factorization problem: why do conscious observers like us perceive the particular Hilbert space factorization corresponding to classical space (rather than Fourier space, say), and more generally, why do we perceive the world around us as a dynamic hierarchy of objects that are strongly integrated and relatively independent? Tensor factorization of matrices is found to play a central role, and our technical results include a theorem about Hamiltonian separability (defined using Hilbert-Schmidt superoperators) being maximized in the energy eigenbasis. Our approach generalizes Giulio Tononi's integrated information framework for neural-network-based consciousness to arbitrary quantum systems, and we find interesting links to error-correcting codes, condensed matter criticality, and the Quantum Darwinism program, as well as an interesting connection between the emergence of consciousness and the emergence of time.

arXiv comments
Replaced to match accepted CSF version; discussion improved, typos corrected. 36 pages, 15 figs
Journal reference
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 76 (2015) 238-270
DOI
doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2015.03.014
Subjects
quant-phQuantum Physics cond-mat.dis-nnDisordered Systems and Neural Networks hep-thHigh Energy Physics, Theory

On Hacker News

Linked by 5 identifiable commenters in 5 comments across 4 threads, from Dec 2015 to Oct 2019. Found in 6 HN submissions from Jan 2014 to Jan 2019. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments4 threads

    • I never said there was broad consensus among all philosophers and physicists, etc. It takes generations for these ideas to truly die, just as it did with other widely believed falsehoods. No one really attacked consciousness from a mechanistic perspective until Turing, and that…

      garmaineView on HNParent context

  1. The Hardening of Consciousness 1 comment
    • To be pedantic - that would only show that consciousness is non-neuronal. Max Tegmark has this idea of "consciousness as a state of matter"[1] - that neurons aren't particularly special - what matters is are particular patterns. These consciousness patterns can be composed of…

      leepowersView on HNParent context

    • relatedly, Max Tegmark tried to do some estimates of Phi values of neural networks in his paper "Consciousness as a State of Matter" https://arxiv.org/pdf/1401.1219v2.pdf And while he seems to take IIT pretty seriously, his conclusion sure seems like a refutation of the idea…

      jes5199View on HNParent context

    • I didn't realize at first that the Physics arXiv blog was the author of this post. Here's the link to the abstract: http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.1219

      telotortiumView on HNParent context

    • This doesn't sound much like a physics paper from the abstract (http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.1219). "why do conscious observers like us perceive..." is an appropriate angle for philosophical discussion (or maybe psychology, depending on where you took that). But in physics, we use…

      dantillbergView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.