<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Optimized simulated annealing for Ising spin glasses · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1401.1084/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1401.1084/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Optimized simulated annealing for Ising spin glasses — mentioned by sanxiyn</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21055514</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1401.1084:21055514</guid><pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 01:17:57 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;In principle, there is no reason why D-wave also can&amp;#x27;t achieve quantum supremacy. It is just that D-wave hasn&amp;#x27;t, so far. As for Ising model, D-wave didn&amp;#x27;t outperform classical algorithm after classical algorithm was tuned (it was a new problem, so existing classical algorithm wasn&amp;#x27;t the best possible), see https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.1084, also there are reasons to suspect why Ising model will not provide any quantum speedup, see https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.5693.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1401.1084/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat.dis-nn</category></item></channel></rss>
