<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Seven, eight, and nine mutually touching infinitely long straight round cylinders: Entanglement in Euclidean space · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1312.6207/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1312.6207/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Seven, eight, and nine mutually touching infinitely long straight round cylinders: Entanglement in Euclidean space — mentioned by Someone</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7538277</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1312.6207:7538277</guid><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 20:14:01 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;About &amp;quot;just cool&amp;quot; thing: that discussion has been done a zillion times. On the one hand, it&amp;#x27;s just one of those funny problems: easy to describe, but far from simple to solve. On the other hand, I would say that mathematicians have earned the right to work on such silly problems, given that, if hey hadn&amp;#x27;t worked on similar silly problems before, our technology would be quite a bit less advanced. Half the world is built on the hobbies of mathematicians. What surprised me is that http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6207 (which gives solutions with 8 and 9 cylinders, if one let&amp;#x27;s go of the constraint that…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1312.6207/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.MG</category></item><item><title>Seven, eight, and nine mutually touching infinitely long straight round cylinders: Entanglement in Euclidean space — mentioned by lotharbot</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7538119</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1312.6207:7538119</guid><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 19:25:29 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#x27;s an arrangement of 8 that&amp;#x27;s very close to touching, but has been proven to not actually touch: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195669808... Others believe they have found both an 8 and a 9: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1312.6207.pdf though this may not be exactly the same problem. In particular, the 9 cylinder problem allows 3 radii to be selected and then the other 6 are calculated as a result (meaning the 9 are probably not all identical.) It appears the 7 result in the initial paper is 7 cylinders of equal radius.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1312.6207/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.MG</category></item></channel></rss>
